What is and is not player-verifiable#

The current MVP exposes rules and results, but not enough cryptographic evidence to reproduce how an outcome was selected.

What a player can inspect#

• The published 20 paylines and scaled paytable.
• Symbol behavior, free-spin rules, feature tiers, collection rules, and regular cap.
• The 92% regular and 2% progressive targets.
• The returned grid and frame timeline for a settled spin.
• Line wins, SCATTER and BONUS counts, awarded features, payout, and balance change.
• Recent server ledger entries for the active session.
• Whether retrying the same request ID returns the stored outcome.
• Public simulation progressive state, including visible value, bounds, version, and hit history.
• On-chain mainnet transaction effects when the relevant public signature is available.

These observations can reveal an arithmetic or disclosure mismatch.

What a player cannot prove today#

A player cannot currently prove:

• which random bytes were selected before a spin;
• that the server committed to those bytes before receiving the wager;
• that a hidden progressive trigger was fixed before contributions approached it;
• that an operator could not regenerate or discard an outcome;
• that the deployed server exactly matches the reviewed repository source;
• that all historical spin records are complete and unaltered; or
• that the theoretical return has received independent certification.

Missing proof material#

The MVP has no player-facing:

• server-seed commitment hash;
• client-selected seed;
• monotonically increasing fairness nonce;
• retired seed reveal;
• versioned seed-to-random-byte algorithm;
• unbiased range-conversion specification;
• result digest;
• progressive-trigger commitment;
• downloadable transcript; or
• one-click verifier.

The server ledger is application-controlled SQL state, not a public or tamper-evident fairness proof.

Claim boundary#

Afterlife must be described as server-authoritative and not yet player-verifiably provably fair. “Uses cryptographic randomness,” “replay-safe,” and “published math” each describe a useful but narrower property. None is a substitute for a complete verification system and independent review.

No current documentation should claim that Afterlife is provably fair, audited, certified, or guaranteed fair.

Next: Verification roadmap.